Uncategorized

  • Organists temptations….

    Like all of us, organists are facing temptations. We can think about, for example, playing a piece of music that is too difficult for the player. Or: pulling out too many stops…

     

    Another one is the desire for more and more stops. Large organs with many stops is for some organists a real desire. Couplers, different mixture stops, various characters of reed stops, strings, and much more. Great to be able to play any piece of music (if you would have the skills), and to provide the congregation with a concert every week again.

     

    In Northern Europe organs many in church were developed for congregational singing. In Germany was the Lutheran church music quite rich and the organs are often reflecting that. In the Netherlands with its Calvinistic influence, the equipment to accompany the bold, unison singing was designed to just do that very well: accompany the congregational singing. This resulted in smaller, but very functional organs that can sing…

     

    In North America the French organ building culture had a significant influence. The Cavaille-Coll organs had an orchestral romantic character, something that can be recognized in the many Aeolian Skinner organs in North America. This resulted in relatively large organs with many stops, but not always with a large volume in sound.

     

    Living in North America, our organists could be influenced by these large instruments – it is like a kid in the candy store. However, generally the design and origin of a large instrument does not serve the congregational singing well.

     

    Back to the temptation… Our churches have smaller organs – often (just) two manuals. That is small compared to what we see around us in other churches. In Langley with our new Casavant we have (just) 22 stops and 2 manuals, which is small compared with many other organs around us.

     

    So what was that temptation again? Wanting a large, impressive organ with many stops. For example…

    • In Langley we have only one Trumpet stop, but one could desire different Trumpet stops with different character.
    • In Langley we have only one Mixture, but one could desire several Mixtures on the different keyboards.
    • In Langley we have just one 16 foot stop in the pedal section, but one could desire several deep bass stops on the pedal.

    The desire for more is a reality for some (young) organists. And they have solutions too: buying electronics: electronics have many stops for little money. And you can leave the pipes in place so that the people in the church may believe it is a real pipe organ – most people won’t notice (…that misleading and giving a false impression are not biblical, is ignored).

     

    There are electronic organs that connect with pipes so that one can also play some pipes on the electronic organ. The pipes are always in the minority, with a multitude of fake organ stops and other effects.

     

    Is there anything wrong with this? Yes, I think that there is something wrong…

     

    1) THE TRUTH
    As I mentioned before: giving the congregation the impression that there is a real pipe organ but placing speakers behind it, is not in line with the Christian faith. Electronic organs are designed and in business to imitate pipe organs and fool the church people! Being true to all aspects of life and using the natural components that are given to us.

     

    2) WHAT IS NEEDED
    The next thing is the organist’s desire for an electronic organ should be challenged in a brotherly fashion: there is a difference between what a church “needs” and what an organist “desires”, “wants” or maybe "deserves". More stops often don’t serve the congregational singing.

     

    3) KEEPING UP
    Electronic sound production does not serve the congregation. Electronic organs do fit-in with our culture of iPods, Computers, Digital media, Projectors, Blackberry’s, etc. but only the sound production of a real pipe organ is movement of air creating vibrations, similar to the human voice.

     

    4) STEWARDSHIP
    The aspect of stewardship should not be ignored. Electronic products are not keeping their value and depreciation is steep and quick. The more electronics are used the more they wear out. In congregations with good unison singing, speakers and amplifiers are taxed heavier than in a small congregation that sings in harmony.

     

    Short-term pain (larger investment) for long-term gain (lasting pipe organ)

    or

    Short-term gain (quick fix to please the church people) for long-term pain (upgrading to the newer technology and replacing worn-out components)

     

    Are organ projects painful for the congregation? Sometimes an organ project can be upbuilding and constructive to the congregational life. Other times it is destructive and a topic of negative discussion in the congregation for years...

     

    Some things that could be considered when dealing with pipe organs:

    • Recognize that an organ brings up emotions. It serves an important role in the accompaniment of the singing in the church and the singing in the church is about salvation and life in Jesus Christ.
       
    • Make sure that the process and communication is open and transparent to the congregation always. This means regular updates of the good and bad.
       
    • Keep a log of all communication about the organ from all parties involved: internal committees and members as well as external advisors and organ builders. Also make note of critical verbal communication.
       
    • Ensure quotes are obtained in writing with issue dates, expiry dates, and conditions. If quotes expire, make sure a new quote is issued and when an extension is granted make sure this is in writing. Avoid verbal agreements.
       
    • If there is ambiguity directionally, request an advisor. This advisor should understand the needs of the congregation and the musical culture of the church. This person should be familiar with the organ industry at large and be able act as a project manager. The reporting structure should be transparent: organ committee/committee of administration/church council.
       
    • Have a timeline in place. Although the planning can be adjusted, a timeline is important to prevent an organ project to drag out, sometimes for a decade or more.
       
    • Helpful people are great, however with church organ projects you want to make sure that things are done well (quality, stewardship) and in time (promise).
       
    • Avoid a conflict of interest and establish accountability: i.e. don't allow an impression to be formed that the organist fulfills his own desires at the expense of the congregation. This is not good for the organist or for the congregation.

    In our churches, an organ project is (too) often treated like a hobby project of a few (over) interested individuals in the congregation. I think that in some places people are more diligent with the acquisition of a used car for themselves than with the churchorgan for the accompaniment of the singing; or where groups of hobbyists are taking their hobby to church and keep busy with the rebuilding of (parts of) the organ while the congregation waits many, many years.

     

    Why are church organs important why can it not become a hobby or personal issue? Because the role of the organ is the accompaniment of the congregational singing.

     

    The Lord thrones on the praises of his people (Psalm 22: 3) and therefore we cannot make decisions on the instrument used for the accompaniment of these praises quickly lightly.

     

    Decisions need to be made carefully and not through democracy and politics in the church because we are dealing with a part of the worship service, which is to the honour and glory of Gods holy name.

     

    Considering this last part, I hope that it gives some direction on how to deal with organ projects in the church.

     

     

  • Olympics.... disqualification and withdrawal...

    At the end of the Olympic games in our backyard (Vancouver) I must say that there were many things that happened at these games. Some great and others not so great. The disqualification of the Dutch speed-skater Sven Kramer caused a lot of reactions world wide...

     

    In 1924 another Olympic athlete did not win the gold medal. Not because of a discqualification, but because he was forced to withdraw before the race began!

     

    The 1924 Olympics were hosted by the city of Paris. Athlete Eric Liddell was a committed Christian and he refused to run on Sunday, with the consequence that he was forced to withdraw from the 100 meter race, his best event. The schedule had been published several months earlier, and his decision was made well before the Games began.

     

    Liddell spent the intervening months training for the 400 meters, an event in which he had previously excelled. Even so, his success in the 400m was largely unexpected. The day of 400 meters race came, and as Liddell went to the starting blocks, an American masseur slipped a piece of paper into Liddell's hand with a quotation from 1 Samuel 2:30, "Those who honour me, I will honour." Eric Liddell ran with that piece of paper in his hand. He not only won the race, but broke the existing world record with a time.

     

    "I believe that God made me for a purpose,

    but He also made me fast.

    When I run, I feel His pleasure."

    Eric Liddell

     

    A story made famous in the film, Chariots of Fire, see a synopsis below, with music by Vangelis.

    Later in life, this Olympic champion became a missionary in China. During World War II, he was captured and imprisoned in a prisoner of war camp. In that camp he taught a hymn (his favorite hymn) to the other prisoners in the camp to provide comfort and hope, to strengthen their faith. In the midst of change and tears, disappointment, grief and fear, Liddell remembered and taught others that the Day was coming when this earth would be gone, and Jesus Christ would reign forever.

    Be still my soul

    Be still my soul - the Lord is on thy side;
    bear patiently the cross of grief or pain;
    leave to thy God to order and provide;
    in every change - he faithful will remain.
    Be still, my soul - thy best thy heavenly Friend
    through thorny ways leads to a joyful end.

    Be still my soul - when dearest friends depart,
    and all is darkened in the vale of tears,
    then shalt thou better know his love - his heart,
    who comes to soothe thy sorrow and thy fears.
    Be still, my soul - the waves and winds still know
    his voice who ruled them - while he dwelt below.

    Be still my soul the hour is hastening on
    when we shall be forever with the Lord,
    when disappointment - grief and fear are gone,
    sorrow forgot - love's purest joys restored,.
    Be still my soul - when change and tears are past,
    all safe and blessed - we shall meet at last.

     

    The scripture reference of this hymn is found in Psalm 46:10:

    "Be still, and know that I am God;
    I will be exalted among the nations,
    I will be exalted in the earth."

    The hymn-writer, Katharina Amalia Dorothea von Schlegel (born on October 22, 1697), was the outstanding figure the Reformed church in Germany. Little is known of her other than she was a Lutheran. Schlegel contributed a number of lyrics to a collection of spiritual songs published. Although she wrote many additional verses for this hymn, most hymnals use just three stanzas. She died about 1768. Be Still, My Soul was translated into English approximately 100 years after it was written by Jane L. Borthwick, a devoted religious and social worker in the Free Church of Scotland. Borthwick was born in Edinburgh in 1813, a noble supporter of home and foreign missions.

    Olympic athlete and champion Eric Liddell died in prisoner of war camp in 1945, a few months before the end of the war.

    “We are all missionaries.
    Wherever we go, we either bring people nearer to Christ,
    or we repel them from Christ.”
    Eric Liddell

    In the Vancouver Olympic Games we heard about disqualifications, but not about a forced withdrawal to honor our Father in heaven.

     

    The games are almost over. We did not win a race. But we may say with the apostle Paul "I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith."  (2 Tim 4:7)

     

    The games are almost over. We did now win the gold of this earth, but we know that "everyone who competes in the games exercises self-control in all things. They then do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable." (1 Cor 9: 25)

     

    It is good to excercise and participate, to compete and try to win, but only when we have our priorities in order: "Fight the good fight of faith; take hold of the eternal life to which you were called, and you made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses. (1 Tim 6: 12)

     

    May God bless you as you continue to run!

     

  • What would you sing...

    Today I heard on my car radio that the high school survivors safely arrived home after their tall ship sank close to the coast of Brazil. Now the stories of what they all went through are coming out.

    In the Globe and Mail I read that the experience was described as "like the Titanic". Students probably have seen the movie and therefore make the comparision. The students compared their experience to that of the Titanic, but the students had a much better ending.  

    I had to think about the Titanic as well. Not because I have seen the movie or can compare, but I heard that these students were singing... and that is a good thing to do, if you find yourself in a difficult situation.

    The people on the Titanic were singing "Nearer My God to Thee" as they faced death. These students were also singing: "One group sang a whole bunch of Disney songs. 'Hakuna Matata' came out one night..." one student recalls.

    What would I, what would you sing, if we would be in such a situation? Disney songs? Or... psalms and hymns? Do we know our psalms and hymns still by heart? A situation such as these students experienced can quickly happen to any one of us, and the ending could be worse... What would you sing?

  • The Power of the Olympic Winter Games 2010

    A once-in-a-lifetime-experience… the Olympics Winter Games in Vancouver 2010. We all want to be part of it. It is exciting. It is fun. It is something we will never forget.

     

    I want to be part of it… I want to enjoy it… I want to be excited like most other people here… but I have mixed feelings… Do I have my priorities right...?

     

    It started long time ago, when the slogan “Do you believe…?” was broadcasted on CTV… it made me think about the Apostles Creed…”I believe in God the Father…” and it made me say in my mind “…whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3: 16). Do you believe - yes I do believe, but not what most people are thinking....

     

    We saw the torch the past few months travel through Canada. We could follow it day by day, no minute by minute, through the Internet. The torch was lit in Greece, from the temple of Zeus with a religious ceremony full of symbolism. Was it just a game… and if so, can we play games with other gods… what about “you shall have have no other gods before Me”?

     

    A person in Vancouver said a few days ago: “It’s such a blessing that the Olympic Spirit has transformed Canada”. The torch lit up the spirit of the Canadians. Fast forwarding, you can see the flame inspiring everyone in Canada, from East to West… but I had to think about Pentecost how the flame of God’s Spirit inspired his people to proclaim his Word.

     

     

    The flame brought light into the usually dark winter months. Light in the dark economic situation. It enlightened our hearts and minds. The flame is inspiring. Some even take their children out of school to see this light. I could not avoid thinking that it is not the torch, and not the Winter Olympics, but Jesus, who says: “I am the Light of the world”.

     

    Many adored the torch, keeping alive the legacy of the 1936 Olympic Games dominated by “Jews not wanted” signs, followed by the genocide of six million Jews.

     

    Our community tries to convince us that the Olympic Winter Games come to us bringing unity and peace. Unity and peace will come to us tomorrow, not at the games and not on the TV, but when we are together in His house, when we hear again that “…the LORD turns His face toward you and give you peace."

     

    Sunday, the day of the Lord our God, is not observed during the Olympics. God does not fit-in with the Olympic Games – or do the Olympic Games not fit-in with God? The 2010 Olympic Games are “Inviting Canadians to believe”. God and the church are also inviting Canadians to believe… There is even a "hymn" that is called “I believe”, sung by a young lady with a wonderful voice. 

     

    When I heard this song yesterday again during the great opening ceremonies (yes, there I go again – I love the effects, the music, these wonderful athletes, the sports…) it resonated in my mind how this fits in with “he who is not with me, is against me”. There is nothing promoting Jesus Christ in the Olympic Games, instead other religions were promoted: old Greek religion at the start of the flame and First Nations religion at the opening ceremony, and on Sunday it is business as usual - no time for God... God? Which god...?

     

    The song “I believe” is for me symbolic for these Olympic Games. I feel torn – I want to be part of the Olympic Game festivities, I want to join in celebration and fun, but I feel not good about it. Maybe the song will explain...

     

    There comes a moment when my heart must stand alone
    On this lonely path I've chosen
    like a house that ‘s not a home
    sometimes when I feel I've had enough
    and I feel like giving up
    you willed me to be all I can be
    now nothing can stop me

    I believe in the power that comes
    From a world brought together as one
    I believe together we'll find
    I believe in the power of you and I

    This is the moment we have dreamed of all our lives
    We'll be the change we wish from others
    We'll stand tall for what its right
    And in my hearts there'll be no doubt
    The arms of the world will come reaching out
    And embrace me to be all I can be
    Now nothing can stop me

    I believe in the power that comes
    From a world brought together as one
    I believe together we'll fly
    I believe in the power of you and I


    I believe the time is right now
    Stand tall and make the world proud
    I believe together we'll fly
    I believe in the power..
    I believe in the power that comes
    From a world brought together as one
    (Of you and I)
    I believe together we'll fly
    I believe in the power of you and I
    (power)
    I believe the time is right now
    (Oh you and I)
    Stand tall and make the world proud
    I believe together we'll fly (Together we'll fly)
    I believe in the power of you and I
    (I believe in the power of you and I)

     

     

    I wish you all a blessed Sunday, in His service!

     

  • Moving a Reed Organ

    A few posts back you can see that I tried to find a good home for a restored reed organ.
    It found a new home with a professional organist who immigrated recently from Germany!!!

    De disassembly was done while the previous owner was moving out
    and I don't have pictures of that process. It was a puzzle to find out
    what could and should come apart, and what should stay together.

    Most screws and construction methods were
    as they were done in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
    We did it all by hand and stayed away from power tools.

    I enjoyed doing this project! My expertise in wood working and my knowledge of
    organ building came in handy (too bad that this was not a pipe organ)...

    Scott and Dan VanderMolen assisted in the rebuilding of this instrument
    in the home of the new owner and Dan made a video with the new owner playing his instrument!
    The rebuilding only took about 5 hours... Thanks guys!

    DSC06364

    The oak case was lifted from a pickup truck onto the balcony as that was the only way to get it inside.

    DSC06362

    All other components were already moved and were waiting for installation.

    DSC06372

    The organ has paper labels inside. One is listing the serial number. On the chest we could see that the manufacturing date was August 1909.

    DSC06374

    The bellow is installed in the case as well as the board that goes underneath the keyboards and chest.

     DSC06376  

    The keyboards and chest installed. We cleaned all mechanical actions.

    DSC06379

    The motor in the back. This was installed about 25 years ago by Hugo Spilker who also restored this instrument. We had to rewire the motor because the wiring was too old.

    DSC06382

    The woodwork in the front is installed.

    DSC06390

    Moved in its place, Scott is working on a few last screws.

    DSC06399

    Pedal is installed and the new owner tries it out.

    Movie 1 - while the last things are assembled

    Movie 2 - The new owner tries the organ

  • Free Book

    I have an extra copy -brand new- of

    A BETTER WAY 
    Rediscovering the Drama of God-Centered Worship
    by MICHAEL HORTON

    If you are interested, please let me know.
    No cost for pick up.
    I can drop it in the mail, if you pay for the shipping

     

  • Christmas

    I know, you're not thinking about Christmas... I just uploaded some of the choir's Christmas concert on YouTube... If you want to wait until December, you can always add this posting to your favorites

    The congregational singing was not recorded properly - maybe we can try again this year...







  • The Canadian Reformed Organists New Year’s Resolutions for 2010

    In 2009 I had the opportunity to attend the worship services in other Canadian Reformed congregations in the Fraser Valley. There were also occassions that other organists played in our church and I had the opportunity to sit in the pew and listen to our own organ...

     

    I noticed that the singing and the accompaniment of the singing was different in each congregation. In some congregations the singing even changed with a different organist (amazing how a few hundred people can change their singing style because of the one person on the organ bench... ). Considering this, I thought that if organists would observe a few guidelines - which are taught by most organ teachers - that would make the accompaniment, the congregational singing, and the organ playing in church in general, much more effective and pleasant to listen to.

     

    keyboard

    I could write a book or record an fukll DVD about accompaniment of congregational singing, but here I focussed on a few things that would improve the singing and the experience of the congregation presented in Ten New Year's Resolutions:

     

        1. THE “BETWEEN-THE-LINE-NOTE”
          I will not play a “connecting” note (with the pedal) in between the lines always,
          especially not when the note does not make sense (i.e. is not a leading note)!
           
        2. BOOK OF PRAISE
          I will not sustain bad habits in congregational singing
          and therefore observe the notes and rests as written in the Book of Praise.
           
        3. TREMOLO
          I will never use the tremolo accompanying the congregational singing
          and I will use the "tremolo effect" sparingly during the worship service.
           
        4. LEFT HAND CHORDS
          I will avoid playing music where the left hand plays repeating chords in staccato style;
          therefore I will limit playing those Dutch organist’s sheet music
          that features this phenomenon frequently.
           
        5. 16’ PEDAL
          I will take more care to selecting stops:
          I will always add an 8’ stop to the pedal
          and not play the pedal with just a 16’ stop -
          unless prescribed by the composer.
           
        6. UPPER MANUAL
          I will break the habit of using the Swell (upper manual) for a solo voice always.
          Instead I will use the Great (lower manual) for solo voices as well.
           
        7. CLARITY
          I will avoid playing a prelude that is “muddy” and
          does not indicate either tempo or tune clearly –
          regardless of the “famous” (Dutch) organist who wrote it or
          how much the people like it.
           
        8. TRANSPOSE
          I will not try to transpose, not try to play from the Book of Praise only,
          not do anything at the keyboard during the church service
          without proper knowledge (lessons) and skills (practice).
          I will not be my own judge either.
           
        9. STOPS
          I will not change the stops while having one hand down on the keyboard,
          so that the change of stops can be heard.
          Instead I will either take my hands of the keyboard, or I will use a preset.
           
        10. MAKE MUSIC
          Play musically and not just “crank out notes” before and after the service.
          I will make sure I know the pieces well.
           

          Some people might say:
          I am not sure how I play and I don't think that this applies to me.
          Then I will add one more to this list:
           

        11. AWARENESS
          I will become (more) aware of my playing and how I accompany in particular and carefully make my choices regarding the aspects listed above.

     

    Disclaimer for the local organists: this was not written for anyone in particular but based on 12 months of listening experience all over the valley .

    NEW YEARs PRAYER
    May our organ (and piano) playing
    in- and outside the worship services be
    Soli Deo Gloria!

     

  • The Ultimate Legacy of John Calvin

    We, and many others use it frequently and John Calvin left it us. No, it’s not his Institution of Christian Religion. Not his letters or his sermons either. It is the Genevan Psalter. Every time when you take your Book of Praise on Sunday morning, you are reminded of the legacy of the Reformer.

    Would there be one of Calvin’s projects that took as long as the Genevan Psalter? Of course, his Institution of Christian Religion took 23 years – this started in 1536 and became his magnum opus in 1559. The Genevan Psalter project started also in 1536, but… this was finished three years after the completion of the Institution of Christian Religion.

    When we consider the degree of influence, the Genevan Psalter is comparable to the Institution of Christian Religion. In the 16th and 17th centuries these Psalms spread out across France, England, Scotland, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and the Netherlands. At the end of the previous century a Japanese translation became available, and this year a complete translation was beautifully published by the Reformed Church of Korea.

    The psalms were also used: in the church and in the arts; at the dining table and behind closed doors. And of course not just in the French language anymore. And the rhythm had to give way to the isometric version (in the Netherlands and some places in North America). But the melodic character of the Genevan Tunes remained and they could be recognized always.

    JohnCalvin_Best It all goes back to Geneva in the 16th century.
    It all goes back to John Calvin.

    Proposals

    It all starts in 1536. John Calvin arrives in Geneva. In October of that year all pastors in the (protestant) city receive a request from city hall about how the church should be organized. Already in November the pastors reply with a number of proposals regarding the celebration of the Lord’s Supper, teaching, marriage forms, and… psalm singing. Remember the congregations in Geneva do not sing yet at that time.

    Whether Calvin was the author of these proposals cannot be confirmed. We know that they were written in his characteristic style.

    The thought behind singing is obvious: singing together “contributes strongly to the edification of the church”. The way it happens right now we have to be ashamed of, write the pastors. “The Psalms can stimulate us to call on the name of the Lord with zeal, as well as to glorify Him with fervor through the songs of praise.”

    And how the congregation should be taught singing, has also been considered by the pastors. Children and young people can learn the songs and sing them in church while the congregation listens and follows in their hearts what is being sung. Once people know the songs they will start singing along.

    This was a beautiful and realistic proposal. Regretfully, the city council only discusses the proposals in 1537 and decides to delay the decision about the proposal regarding singing Psalms indefinitely.

    Songbook

    Shortly thereafter Calvin and Farel are expelled from Geneva. Calvin ends up in Strasburg serving as pastor of a French refugee congregation.

    Here Calvin continues the work he started in Genevan. Within a few weeks after his arrival, the French congregation is singing, in their own language.

    In order to do this, Calvin publishes a songbook: “Aulcuns pseaulmes et cantiques mys en chant”. It is published in 1539 and it contains 19 Psalms and three ”Cantiques”: a rhyming of the 10 Commandments, the Song of Simeon, and the Apostolic Creed.

    How does Calvin get these songs together? He uses thirteen French Psalms that are already going around in Strasburg and of which he does not know the author (he found out later that these were composed by the poet Clément Marot). The other songs he wrote himself.

    This songbook is used as soon as it is available, with the assistance of children. Requests from other cities for this songbook, and the booklet is distributed throughout the regions and abroad.

    Preface

    In September 1541 Calvin returns to Geneva. He continues where he left of, which includes the singing in the church. Remember: it is still quiet during the church service.

    In 1542 he publishes a songbook with 35 Psalms and four hymns. Five Psalms and two hymns are by Calvin and the rest is by Marot. In November Marot travels to Geneva as well.

    Already within a year Calvin publishes a larger edition of the songbook. Apparently he has realized that his talents for poetry and rhyming were limited because this edition only contains rhymings by Marot: 49 Psalms, the Song of Simeon (considered a psalm) and three Hymns.

    Calvin also writes an extensive preface in this edition. Singing, he writes, is praying. And praying requires fitting and sacred songs.  And even Paul speaks not only of praying by mouth: but also of singing. And in truth we know by experience that singing has great force and vigor to move and inflame the hearts of men to invoke and praise God with a more vehement and ardent zeal.” That is why fitting and sacred songs are needed. Where would you find those? “When we have looked thoroughly, and searched here and there, we shall not find better songs nor more fitting for the purpose, than the Psalms of David, which the Holy Spirit spoke and made through him”, Calvin writes. Regarding the tune, it should be “neither light nor frivolous; but that it have weight and majesty.”

    Calvin’s vision for the singing of the church will have vast influence in France, but also in the Netherlands, where Calvin’s preface to the Psalms was often included in the Dutch Psalters. The Calvinistic tradition becomes are characteristic psalm-singing tradition.

    Half a year

    After 1543 the development of the psalms is shortly put on hold. Then Théodore de Bèze arrives in Geneva. Calvin convinces him to continue with the psalm project. That results in the publication of a revised edition of the Psalm book in 1551. It contains 83 psalms of which 48 are by de Bèze.

    After this there is a short break again. Only in 1561 de Bèze can dedicate time again. This time it is within a year that the next edition is published. All 150 psalms are included as well as two hymns (Song of Simeon and the Ten Commandments).

    In this 1562 publication a schedule is included. In every worship service 30 stanzas should be sung. Ever week there are three worship services: two on Sunday and one on Wednesday. This means that all 150 psalms would be sung completely in half a year. (In Langley we sung only 25 stanza’s on Christmas day, which was more than the 15-18 stanzas we usually sing J)

    Unique

    The Genevan Psalter turns out to become of monumental value in church and cultural history. And it is unique. Many reformers of the 16th century provide their congregations with a prayer book that often included also a few of the Genevan Psalms. The congregations of Calvin however had the complete Psalter.

    John Calvin –he dies in 1564– has witnessed the completion of this major project at the end of his life. And how “his” Psalter starts to spread out, being used in many congregations in many countries. What he envisioned in 1536 was blessed by the Lord: countless congregations sing the psalms, and all psalms.

    Psaume 42 Theodorus Beza, 1562

    1. Ainsi qu’on oit le cerf bruire,
    Pourchassant le frais des eaux,
    Ainsi mon coeur qui souspire,
    Seigneur, apres tes ruisseaux,
    Va tousjours criant, suyvant
    Le grand, le grand Dieu vivant.
    Helas donques, quand sera-ce
    Que verray de Dieu la face?

    5. Tous les grans flots de ton onde
    Par dessus moy ont passé:
    Mais sur un poinct je me fonde,
    Que n’estant plus courroucé,
    De jour tes biens m’envoiras,
    De nuict chanter me feras,
    Priant d’une ame ravie,
    Toy seul autheur de ma vie.

    Post Scriptum

    Before the year of John Calvin, the year 2009 A.D., ends, I wanted to write about the Genevan Psalter as the ultimate legacy of John Calvin. In our North American reformed periodicals, such as Clarion and Reformed Perspective have barely highlighted this major inheritance that many Reformed churches around the world still treasure.

    Lutherans treasured the Genevan Psalter: Bach used the tunes in his Cantatas. The Reformed churches in Hungary cherish Calvin’s legacy, in Japan they are sung. In South Africa these Psalms are sung, Indonesian churches recognized the modes of these Psalms in their local music culture.
    Earlier this year the Reformed Church of Korea published the most beautiful Korean edition of the Genevan Psalter, which they are passionate about and which they love dearly. Sadly here in North America the Genevan Psalter gives often food for controversy and debate.

    Ultimately the battle about singing the Genevan Psalter is not about the tunes, it is not about the word the Geneva, it is not about the Renaissance music of the 16th century: the battle is about the Psalms. The Genevan Psalter enables the whole church of Christ, young and old, in any country or language, to sing the Word of God. Luther acknowledged that singing the world could be more powerful than reading the word and Satan hates the singing by God's people. Satan tries to destroy the singing of Psalms in the church. He has the replacement songs ready, scriptural songs, less scriptural songs and somewhat scriptural songs, trying to make us love those more than the Psalms. Sadly, he has been successful in many church denominations around us. I pray that in 2010 and beyond we may accept the ultimate legacy of John Calvin as a gift from God and treasure it, because it enables us to sing about our Saviour.

    Have a Blessed New Year!

    Frank

     

  • No Christmas next year...?

     There is enough reason to get rid of Christmas. The Reformed Theologian Prof.Dr. A. van de Beek writes in his (Dutch) book “De Kring om de Messias” (Circle around the Messiah). ,,This becomes more clear all the time as we see the influence of Santa Claus in Christmas '', he writes. “That’s not a loss for the church but a win.”

     

    According to the professor Christmas is the only Christian feast day that does not have a Jewish parallel. “Christmas does not have roots in the Early Christian church either. Early Christians did not feel a need to celebrate the birth of Jesus”, writes Van de Beek.

     

    prophecy  He continues that Christmas was only celebrated in the 4th century, when Christianity became a state religion. “Christmas is not the fulfillment of an Old Testament feast, but the continuation of a Roman and Celtic Mid-Winter Feast. The symbols originate in Scripture but from paganism. A Christian church that considers itself part of the fulfillment of Gods grace as it was promised long ago, should not know what to do with Christmas.

     

    In Christmas time we hear a paradox in the story that God came to earth as a baby in the manger, according to Van de Beek. “That seems to match with the confession that the crucified Christ is the Lord of Lords. That connection can only be justified if one removes the cross from the Jewish biblical context and disregards its true meaning.

     

    The cross was to execute a person in the first place and not a place to suffer, according to the theologian. Christ was executed as the condemned (according to the law). “That is a complete different story than the little child in the manger. Even Luke 2 becomes shallow if you take it out of its Jewish context.”

     

    Van de Beek point to the facts that Jesus was born in a shed surrounded by animals. In the old Testament all first born animals were to be killed as a sacrifice as a remembrance of the tenth plague in Egypt. “For Jews this is very symbolic”, he explains further.

     

    Often this connection is avoided. Instead we hear the story of the poor, little Christmas child that was born in Bethlehem. “Just like all other romantic Christmas stories about a little baby that became a King. And there are too many of the tales. These stories are favorites with rich people.''

     

    When asked, Van de Beek explains that in his opinion Chritsmas, just like the rest of Scripture point towards Good Friday when Christ died on the cross. “You can’t disconnect Christmas from Good Friday. Generally there is too much attention given to the partial chapter of Luke 2. The coming of Jesus into the world is just the beginning of His life on earth. Nowadays this coming is presented as something special, something that requires our attention and devotion by itself. “

     

    Celebrating Christmas is also not possible, according to Van de Beek, “without dying with/in Christ.” “Often Christmas is seen as a light in the darkness, and then we continue on like nothing has happened.”

     

    Van de Beek does not understand pastors who only say “He paid for our sins” (on the cross) and then think that they have placed Christmas in light of His sacrifice on the cross. “We have to realize our own sins of every day here on earth. If you are aware of that, you will celebrate Christmas differently than many around you”.

     

    Van de Beek is leading the worship service on Christmas day in his congregation. “I celebrate Christmas like anyone else. As theologian I can reflect on Christmas, but as long as my congregation celebrates Christmas, I will celebrate with them.”

     

    Dr. A van de Beek is author of “De kring om de Messias” (Circle around the Messiah) and “Jezus Kurios: de christologie als hart van de theologie.” (Jesus Kurios: christology as heart of theology)